34 | Plant & Works Engineering www.pwemag.co.uk August/September 2025 Special Focus Skills & Training The past few years have brought a quiet transformation to maintenance in the UK. On the surface, factory floors and plant rooms may look unchanged, but the technology behind them has shifted. Condition monitoring sensors now flag faults before they cause stoppages. Engineers receive alerts from hundreds of miles away. A single dashboard can show the health of an entire production line in real time. The idea of “Maintenance 4.0” - using digital tools, data and automation to anticipate and prevent breakdowns — is no longer a theory tested only by global manufacturers. Medium-sized engineering firms, local utilities and even public-sector organisations are starting to embed it. The challenge is not persuading decision-makers of the benefits, but ensuring the people responsible for keeping assets running can work fluently with these new systems. That calls for a shift in training approaches, and one that respects both the realities of industrial work and the need for human judgement. Many training programmes still follow the patterns set in the 1980s: a classroom for theory, a workshop for practice, and a focus on repairing faults after they’ve occurred. That model is poorly matched to an environment where maintenance technicians must interpret live sensor data, understand the implications of a machine-learning forecast, and act before problems disrupt production. The skills required are layered: traditional mechanical and electrical competence, digital literacy, analytical thinking, and the ability to collaborate across departments. Developing that combination starts with realistic learning environments. Several UK training centres and forward-thinking employers are creating small-scale but fully operational “learning lines” or “mini plants”. These facilities replicate the machinery, control systems and data flows found in actual operations. Trainees might be asked to investigate a simulated vibration spike in a pump, pull up the associated maintenance history on a digital twin, and decide whether to schedule a shutdown. Mistakes here don’t cost production time, but they do prompt discussion and reflection. This type of practice shortens the time it takes for new recruits or upskilling staff to become confident in live settings. Digital simulation Digital simulation is proving to be an equally valuable tool. A detailed virtual model can reproduce the layout and behaviour of a system, allowing trainees to test scenarios that would be too disruptive or hazardous in reality. Faults can be introduced, maintenance routines rehearsed, and alternative actions compared. In sectors such as energy generation and rail, where safety margins are tight, this approach has already cut training costs and reduced errors. Augmented reality is also maturing into a practical aid rather than a novelty. When integrated with maintenance software, AR headsets or tablets can overlay equipment with step-by-step instructions, sensor readings, and parts information. Used in training, it reinforces the correct procedures while keeping the learner’s focus on the task in front of them. For existing staff who already know the plant inside out but need to bridge the digital gap, short, modular courses can be more effective than lengthy retraining. These may run over a few evenings or weekends, or be completed online between shifts. Topics such as industrial Preparing the workforce for the realities of Maintenance 4.0 UK industry is adopting Maintenance 4.0 tools at pace, but skills development has lagged. Effective training blends realistic practice, digital simulation, modular learning and mentoring, ensuring staff can interpret data and act decisively. The goal is not just technology uptake, but a workforce ready for predictive, connected asset care. PWE reports.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MjQ0NzM=